Skip to Content

Copper-Bottoming vs Blacking

12 October 2024 by
Copper-Bottoming vs Blacking
pqoc

Copper-bottoming a narrowboat, while less common than traditional blacking, provides a range of technical benefits that make it a compelling option for certain boat owners.

Why It’s Not Common

The initial costs and complexity of installation are the main reasons copper-bottoming is not more widely used. Narrowboat owners generally find traditional blacking, despite its need for regular reapplication, to be more economical in the short term. Additionally, many owners of narrowboats, which are often used in inland waterways where corrosion isn’t as severe as in saltwater environments, find that blacking provides adequate protection.

Conclusion

While copper-bottoming offers excellent long-term protection, reduced maintenance, and eco-friendly benefits, it comes with a high initial cost and installation complexity. For boat owners planning to keep their vessel for a long time and who want to reduce maintenance intervals, copper may be a worthwhile investment. However, for others, traditional blacking remains a more practical and cost-effective solution.

Here’s a more detailed breakdown:

1. Durability and Longevity

Copper is incredibly durable and resistant to corrosion, making it an ideal material for hull protection. Narrowboats often use bitumen-based blacking or more advanced epoxy coatings to prevent corrosion and wear. However, these materials typically need to be reapplied every 2-5 years, depending on usage and environmental conditions. Copper, by contrast, could last decades without needing significant maintenance. Its long lifespan could potentially save money over time despite the higher initial costs.

2. Corrosion Resistance

Copper's natural ability to resist corrosion in both fresh and saltwater environments is one of its key advantages. In inland waterways, especially those with a mix of fresh and brackish water, metal hulls can suffer from electrochemical corrosion. Copper cladding can provide superior protection from rust compared to blacking or epoxy, especially in corrosive environments.

3. Anti-fouling Properties

Traditional blacking does little to prevent biofouling, the accumulation of algae, barnacles, mussels, and other organisms that cling to the hull. These can increase drag, reduce fuel efficiency, and require regular cleaning. Copper has natural anti-fouling properties, inhibiting the growth of marine life on the hull. This could make a copper-bottomed boat more efficient, as it would encounter less drag over time, resulting in smoother sailing and potentially lower fuel consumption.

4. Reduced Maintenance

Narrowboats treated with blacking or epoxy require periodic dry docking for re-application of the protective coating. This is not only time-consuming but also incurs regular costs. Copper cladding, on the other hand, can remain effective for decades without requiring frequent reapplication, significantly reducing the time and expense spent on maintenance.

5. Aesthetic Appeal

Copper-bottomed boats can develop a distinctive green patina over time as the metal reacts with air and water (oxidation). This patina is not only attractive but also adds to the hull’s protective layer. Some boat owners may appreciate the aesthetic look that comes with the aging process of copper.

6. Eco-Friendliness

Copper's natural resistance to fouling and corrosion reduces the need for chemical-based anti-fouling paints and harsh cleaning chemicals, which can be harmful to aquatic environments. Additionally, because it lasts longer, copper reduces the need for frequent maintenance cycles that require dry docking and involve the use of synthetic materials, making it an environmentally friendly choice.

Drawbacks of Copper Bottoming

  • Upfront Cost: One of the most significant disadvantages is the cost. Applying a copper bottom to a narrowboat is substantially more expensive than blacking. The material itself is costly, and the process requires skilled labour and specialised techniques, which increases installation expenses.

  • Installation Complexity: Copper-bottoming isn’t as simple as blacking or applying an epoxy coat. It involves either bonding copper sheets to the hull or using copper-infused paints, both of which require precise application. Mistakes in installation could reduce effectiveness or result in corrosion between the copper and steel hull.

  • Electrolytic Corrosion: When copper is used on steel hulls, there’s a potential for galvanic corrosion (a process where one metal corrodes preferentially when in electrical contact with another). Careful installation and the use of insulating materials between the hull and the copper are essential to prevent this issue. Without proper insulation, the interaction between copper and steel in water could accelerate hull degradation rather than prevent it.

  • Weight: Copper is heavier than traditional blacking materials, which could affect the boat’s performance and buoyancy. In some cases, this additional weight might necessitate adjustments in the boat’s ballast.

Copper-Bottoming vs Blacking
pqoc 12 October 2024
Tags
Archive
Understanding VHF Radio for Narrowboats